CFEs should consider trade compliance as a profession
Read Time: 14 mins
Written By:
Interview by Anna Brahce
I grew up in Toronto, Canada. My family spent weekends, holidays and summers at our lake cottage in Muskoka, Ontario, where we enjoyed camping, fishing, swimming, snowmobiling, and water and snow skiing.
Ever since I can remember, I’ve had an innate desire to distinguish right from wrong. My mentors, including some who worked in law enforcement, helped instill in me a strict moral compass and determination to do the right thing.
As the president and CEO of Reed Research Investigations, I oversee client development, case intake and consultation, and case management. I consult with clients on fraud development programs and teach seminars on various fraud topics. I assist on investigations regularly, and I keep my skills sharp by completing an interview or assisting in surveillance when we need extra hands.
My company largely investigates corporate fraud and litigation concerning injury claims. Our cases involve healthcare and insurance frauds, including staged automobile collisions. We conduct a variety of investigations for internal theft, fraudulent payment schemes and individual victims.
Since red flags have already been raised about possible fraud when a file comes our way, we begin our investigations by completing a fulsome case review to determine the most accurate picture and context for the situation. We identify the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats (SWOT analysis) surrounding the case, and address the time, scope and cost to assess next steps.
My most memorable case involved a fraudulent death claim involving a subject who applied for $3.5 million worth of life insurance from five different insurance companies over two years. Then, the subject and his wife staged his death with a fake heart attack while they were visiting Iran. Because there were conflicting details about the death, hospital, timing and locations, the death was considered suspicious, and the claim was denied. The wife disputed the denial of coverage and litigated, and the five insurance companies settled the case for $1.3 million.
My team continued to investigate, and we found a house purchased in the wife’s name in Orange County, California, made after the settlement. We conducted surveillance in Ontario, Canada, and found one of her sons selling fake IDs, and through surveillance in California, we found a man who matched the allegedly deceased’s description driving another son to school. We collected DNA from gum the son in Ontario had discarded and from the subject in California through surveillance I conducted while he and his wife ate at a diner.
The DNA samples were a parental match, showing the man in California was the “deceased” subject living under an alias. He and his wife were arrested in California and deported to Canada. They were tried and convicted of various counts of fraud, and each received 10 years in jail. Some of the money was recovered through forfeiture, but much of it had been sent to Iran.
“The Crypto Bros” case, which involved a multilayered cryptocurrency and foreign currency investment Ponzi scheme and pyramid scheme, was another memorable case for me. Three young adults claimed they were making a fortune on investments and flaunted it on social media, depicting private jets, exotic cars like McLarens and Lamborghinis, rental mansions and global travel. They constantly sought more investors and extracted additional funds from them to furnish their extravagant lifestyle and pay back earlier investors.
The civil fraud recovery lawyer, Norm Groot, CFE, hired my team to seek recovery for some of the victims. Our work on this case eventually received national attention on “W5,” a Canadian investigative news and television program. This also prompted further police involvement and criminal charges. Two parties in the case are still awaiting trial, and the third fled to Dubai and has a warrant for his arrest. This case was featured in the opening keynote presentation at the 2025 ACFE Fraud Conference Canada.
A top lesson I’ve learned from working in the anti-fraud field is the importance of patience and perseverance. Properly investigating fraud doesn’t include taking shortcuts. I contributed a chapter about the necessity of patience and perseverance for maintaining investigative skills in “The Art of Investigation Revisited: Practical Tips from the Experts,” by Chelsea Binns, Ph.D., CFE, and Bruce Sackman.
I first heard about the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE) when some colleagues asked me to speak to an ACFE local chapter about 12 years ago. They encouraged me to attend an ACFE Global Fraud Conference. I then spoke at the 2015 ACFE Canadian Fraud Conference and the 27th Annual ACFE Global Fraud Conference in Las Vegas, Nevada, and have spoken and instructed at almost all of the annual and Canadian conferences since.
After being part of the Certified Fraud Examiner (CFE) Job Analysis Task Force that updated the test outline for the CFE Exam in 2019, John D. Gill, J.D., CFE, approached me and encouraged me to acquire my CFE credential, which I earned in August 2022.
Anyone with the CFE credential understands what it takes to acquire it and the annual education required to keep it. That shared recognition is an easy gateway into discussions with fellow professionals who recognize and respect your level of expertise.
Unlock full access to Fraud Magazine and explore in-depth articles on the latest trends in fraud prevention and detection.
Read Time: 14 mins
Written By:
Read Time: 16 mins
Written By:
Tim Harvey, CFE
Read Time: 7 mins
Written By:
David G. Banks, CFE, CIA
Read Time: 14 mins
Written By:
Read Time: 16 mins
Written By:
Tim Harvey, CFE
Read Time: 7 mins
Written By:
David G. Banks, CFE, CIA