Swipe, Smile, Scam: How Your Popcorn Bill May Be Funding Fraud
Based on firsthand experience by the author, this blog exposes a likely case of cash larceny, skimming and fraudulent billing.
Based on firsthand experience by the author, this blog exposes a likely case of cash larceny, skimming and fraudulent billing.
Movie theatres have long been associated with entertainment, leisure and quality family time. A visit to a multiplex is often about more than just the film; it is about the experience. However, beneath the layers of buttered popcorn and fizzy drinks could lie a scheme so well-orchestrated that it goes unnoticed, not only by customers but also by management.
What follows is one encounter at a movie theater involving questionable practices, which the author then provides details on, including controls and best practices that may be ignored in these types of fast-paced business environments.
The server asked me to pay INR 910 — INR 400 for the nachos and INR 510 for the soda — and I gave him my card to collect the payment. The server was unable to post the sale in the system, which appeared to be for a nachos combo, which included a large popcorn, nachos and large drink, totaling INR 1190. The combo was showing up on the register as having the payment split, raising my suspicion. I followed up with the server, stating that I did not order the combo, to which he replied that it was someone else’s bill. The server then called another server over, who proceeded to change the initial nachos and large drink for INR 910 to the nachos combo for INR 1190, adding that partial payment was made in cash for INR 280 and charged my card for the remaining balance of INR 910.
My instincts flagged the transaction as suspicious, but before I could probe further, the food was handed over. I was hurriedly asked to share my mobile number since the print bill system wasn’t functioning. I complied, providing my number with an expectation that the digital bill would follow shortly. At that point, I was still optimistic and moved on. But as the movie resumed, the receipt never arrived. By the time the credits rolled, I had a growing discomfort about the entire interaction.
Post-screening, I revisited the counter and requested the bill again. This time, I spoke with the on-duty manager, who checked the system and asked me for the timestamp of payment, which was available in the SMS for payment. The manager confirmed a payment of INR 910 via card. He also confirmed that the remaining portion of the combo — roughly INR 280, the cost difference of popcorn in the combo — was marked as settled via cash. I had never made any cash payment.
I requested a copy of the invoice, to which he said that the reprint is not feasible. I then asked him to allow me to take photograph of the billing system. He refused.
I told him I had only ordered and collected the nachos and soda, so why have I been billed for popcorn as well? Rather than surprised, he was afraid. Then, I asked him to share the copy of CCTV footage. He refused to share it, but I asked him to review it and verify what I had purchased.
He checked the footage and returned and said, “Sir you are right, you have not taken the popcorn, but the bill is posted and adjusted with split payments for a combo.”
I requested him to call his manager so that I could speak to him, but he said he would look into this and would come back with a proper justification within two days, for which he even took my mobile number.
I then asked for a full refund per the multiplex’s policy; if the invoice is not provided at the time of purchase, then the food is on the multiplex. He simply took out INR 910 from the cash register and gave it to me with an assurance that he would come back to me with justification.
Thinking like a fraud examiner, I identified a potential modus of fraud via asset misappropriation through a combination of cash larceny and skimming. Let’s define what these terms are:
Cash larceny is a scheme in which an incoming payment is stolen after it has been recorded on the organization’s books.
Skimming is a scheme in which an incoming payment is stolen from an organization before it is recorded on the organization’s books.
In the suspected scheme, INR 290 is stolen per transaction by:
Let’s examine the anatomy of what appears to be a classic cash larceny scheme — a sub-category of asset misappropriation, as defined by the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE).
Combo Pricing Arbitrage: A popcorn tub alone costs around INR 570. However, in a combo, it is effectively priced at INR 280–300 due to bundled discounts.
Unauthorized Adjustments: When a customer requests only two out of three combo items, the server bills them under the combo but does not give the third item. He charges the full amount via card and marks the remaining combo value as paid in cash, a payment never actually made.
Pocketing the Difference: The server does not hand over the unclaimed popcorn to the customer. Instead, he uses the popcorn later for another cash-paying customer, accepts INR 570 and pockets the difference of INR 290 as unrecorded income. The popcorn is already falsely billed in the earlier combo, creating a double gain opportunity.
Receipt Suppression: Customers are often not issued bills or receive them only after follow-ups, ensuring minimal evidence trails.
This scheme not only defrauds the customer by charging for items not received but also defrauds the employer by skimming cash revenue and suppressing billing records.
Such frauds typically exploit weaknesses, lapsing internal controls and leading to system failure.
Reconciliation between combo versus à la carte sales is not stringently tracked in many POS systems. This lack of visibility fuels continued leakage.
This fraud works because it targets three human actions:
These behavioral signals are manipulated expertly to conduct fraud without resistance.
In addition to financial losses, such actions compromise customer morale. When a brand lacks transparency, whether intentionally or unintentionally, it undermines consumer confidence. If a customer receives neither an invoice nor a detailed breakdown of charges, it raises concerns regarding:
Disclaimer: Please note that this article is written in a personal capacity and does not reflect the views or affiliations of any organizations the author is associated with.